If Nanoco is going after graphene for light emission, they won’t be the first public company doing so. Dotz Nano (ASX: DTZ) has been working on and selling graphene for light emission, but the properties are not even close to those required for displays. Based on their website offerings, it appears as though most products have broad emission (70+ nm), poor efficiency (20-30%) and do not absorb blue light well enough to be considered for current LED displays. With these properties, I remain skeptical about the potential of graphene as a quantum dot substitute.
Other types of 2D materials
Just like quantum dots, 2D nanomaterials have numerous potential applications such as catalysis, photovoltaics/light harvesting, electronics, lasers, and of course displays. This is not the first time 2D materials are being explored for display applications, in fact, a recent review of perovskite nanoplatelets (a 2D cousin of perovskite quantum dots) supports the idea that this type of material could be an ideal candidate for optical technologies (like LEDs for example) due to it’s simple synthesis, low cost, and high performance. Perovskites are relatively straightforward to make at large scale, and with impressive optical properties they are getting a lot of attention from display makers. If you will be attending SID Display Week 2018, you’ll notice an entire session on perovskites – definitely a technology to keep your eye on.
The classic quantum dot material cadmium selenide has also been explored in its 2D form, and the results are compelling. At only a few atoms thick, these thin sheets of CdSe have incredible emission properties with peak widths of <10 nm possible (compare that to typical CdSe QDs which are ~30 nm, and InP which are ~40 nm). Narrowing peaks means improved color gamut and efficiency of displays. Perhaps a viable path to Rec 2020?